Friday, 30 September 2016

Options for exchanging information between domains

There are various approaches for exchanging information between domains in a system.

1. Fat Command, Subordinate System.
The system that holds the information commands a subordinate to do some work. In the command it provides all the information that it needs.
For example an Order Processing System may send a SendCustomerEmail command to a Notification system and that command holds all of the data deemed necessary to populate an email.
The recipient acts immediately upon the receipt of the command.

2. Fat Command, Thin Events
A system sends a command to a second system. That command contains all of the public information that is necessary for the execution of an action, for example SavePaymentCardDetails.
At some point in the future that system, or an unrelated system issues an event that triggers the execution of an action.
An example may be a front end Web application may preload a payment system with SavePaymentCardDetails. The payments domain saves the card details to it's domain repository. Later on the Fraud check system issues a FraudCheckPassed and the Payment domain then bills the credit card.

3. Thin Event, We'll Call You
In this scenario an event is published and the receiving system calls the Web API of the sender (or other systems) to get the information required to perform the action. For example, an Order Despatch system publishes the OrderDispatched event and the subscribing Customer Notification system calls the Order API to get the details of the order so it can send an email to the customer.

4. Fat events
In this scenario an event is published which contains the public information shareable with other domains. For example the OrderCreated event is published which contains the Line Items, Delivery Address, Billing Address etc.
There are cons to this approach:

  • You may be encouraged to publish information that want to hide (addresses)
  • You may not be able to restrict access to that information
  • An implicit coupling may be developed. You may get a whole number of subscribers to your events, some of whom you have no knowledge about, who become heavily dependent upon your events. You then struggle to upgrade or deprecate older versions of the message.

References
http://andreasohlund.net/2012/02/21/talk-putting-your-events-on-a-diet/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34545336/event-driven-architecture-and-structure-of-events



No comments:

Post a comment